For decades, genetic technologies in food production have sparked intense debate. Once met with suspicion and media-fueled fear, the concept of modifying crops has long been associated with the controversial term "GMOs." But a quieter, more precise revolution is underway—and the British public appears ready to embrace it.

A recent survey commissioned by British Sugar, one of the UK’s most influential agribusinesses, reveals a marked shift in public perception: 69% of UK adults now support the use of gene editing in agriculture to increase sustainability, reduce environmental impact, and bolster food security.

This represents a remarkable evolution in public sentiment, particularly as climate change, rising food costs, and global supply chain pressures reshape the priorities of farmers, food producers, and consumers alike.


Understanding the Difference: Gene Editing vs. Genetic Modification

Before exploring the implications of this new wave of support, it's important to distinguish gene editing from traditional genetic modification:

  • Genetic Modification (GM) typically involves inserting foreign DNA from unrelated species into an organism.

  • Gene Editing (GE)—such as CRISPR-Cas9—precisely tweaks or deletes genes within the organism’s existing genome, without introducing external DNA.

While both techniques influence an organism’s traits, gene editing mimics natural mutations with greater speed and precision. Many regulators and scientists argue this makes GE crops fundamentally different from GMOs in both safety profile and public acceptability.


The Survey Results: Who Supports Gene Editing and Why

Commissioned by British Sugar and conducted by independent researchers, the 2025 survey polled a nationally representative sample of 2,000 UK adults. The results were eye-opening:

  • 69% of UK adults overall support the use of gene editing in agriculture.

  • Among Gen Z (18–25-year-olds), support rises to a striking 80%.

  • Support is particularly high among those who identify sustainability and food security as key concerns.

When asked what motivated their support, respondents cited:

  • 🌱 Environmental sustainability – 44%

  • 🛒 Food affordability – 50%

  • 📉 Reducing chemical inputs – 37%

  • 🌾 Resilience against pests and climate change – 42%

These figures underscore a population increasingly aware of the link between agricultural innovation and wider societal challenges.


Gene Editing in Practice: Why It Matters for UK Agriculture

The UK faces mounting pressures on its agricultural system: climate volatility, supply chain fragility, high input costs, and rising consumer demand for sustainably produced food. Gene editing offers a powerful toolbox to tackle these issues.

Enhanced Crop Resilience

Gene editing can help crops withstand:

  • Drought and extreme temperatures

  • Pests and pathogens (reducing the need for pesticides)

  • Soil salinity and nutrient depletion

Reduced Input Dependency

GE crops can be bred to:

  • Fix nitrogen naturally (reducing synthetic fertiliser use)

  • Resist fungal diseases, cutting fungicide applications

  • Mature earlier or grow in marginal conditions, increasing yield stability

Improved Nutritional Profiles

Scientists are developing crops with:

  • Increased vitamin and mineral content (e.g. zinc-enriched wheat)

  • Reduced allergens or antinutrients

  • Enhanced shelf life and reduced waste


A Sugar Beet Case Study: The British Sugar Initiative

British Sugar is leading a multi-million-pound gene editing research project to improve the sustainability of sugar beet—a major UK crop grown on 3,000 farms, supplying over half the country’s sugar.

The initiative, involving partners such as the John Innes Centre and Tropic Biosciences, focuses on:

  • Developing disease-resistant sugar beet varieties

  • Reducing reliance on crop protection chemicals

  • Increasing yield stability amid climate pressure

Backed by £660,000 in government funding under the UK’s genetic innovation framework, the project highlights how public-private partnerships are driving the future of smart farming.


Regulatory Reform: The Genetic Technology Act 2023

This public shift in attitude coincides with a major policy transformation. In March 2023, the UK Parliament passed the Genetic Technology (Precision Breeding) Act, allowing gene-edited crops to be grown commercially in England (subject to strict regulation).

This landmark legislation:

  • Separates gene editing from GMOs in legal terms

  • Streamlines approval processes for new precision-bred crops

  • Encourages domestic innovation in plant science

By removing key regulatory hurdles, the Act enables UK researchers and producers to develop and deploy gene-edited crops more competitively.


Overcoming Skepticism: A Question of Transparency and Trust

Despite growing support, a segment of the public remains cautious. Concerns include:

  • Long-term health implications

  • Corporate control over seeds

  • Loss of agricultural diversity

Experts agree that transparent labelling, public engagement, and independent regulation are essential to maintaining trust.

Far from replacing traditional farming, proponents argue that gene editing can complement regenerative, organic, and agroecological systems—providing new tools for old challenges.


Conclusion: A Future Written in the Genes

The tide is turning. Gene editing is no longer a taboo topic—it’s increasingly seen as a practical, precise, and publicly accepted solution to the growing challenges of food production.

With public support growing, legislative frameworks in place, and ambitious industry research underway, the UK is poised to become a global leader in agricultural biotechnology.

If implemented responsibly, gene editing could help British farming become more sustainable, resilient, and equitable, while feeding a nation that’s hungry for progress—and honey, not hype.


References